“The Hollywood machine has always crushed individuality in filmmaking”, compare the extent to which the films you have studied display auteur individuality
Casablanca, the 1942 Michael Curtiz film, is a product of the time of its release and the Hollywood studio system at the time. The supposed ‘Golden Age’ of Hollywood consisted of heroic characters, lavish sets and attractive actors, lit so they could look their best. Casablanca perhaps represents this era of film making the best as it uses all of the conventional film making techniques that films of the era were known for. The 1967 film Bonnie and Clyde, directed by Arthur Penn, was made in a changing landscape of filmmaking, specifically for Hollywood. Its realistic dialogue and explicitly violent scenes have made it revolutionary and a good indicator for the change in the way Hollywood films were produced. The film is about a group of criminals robbing banks and gas stations across many states in America. The film was a product of the contexts in which it was produced, as many sequences created and were influenced by change and innovation. No longer were the films’ production controlled by the studio, directors could gain auteur individuality.
From the 1930s to the 1940s, studios employed a business model in which the whole production of a film is controlled. Specific theatre chains could only show films by the studios that owned them. Meaning it was vertically integrated; creating a monopoly. This allowed for very little to be shown from outside of America, as they were all owned by Hollywood studios. Warner Brothers was not exempt from this; so much so, they developed a ‘house style’, like many other studios. Warner Brothers’ house style was mostly considered ‘big-screen realism’. Early on they created many gangster films and crime dramas. This was mainly because they resonated with ordinary people suffering financial troubles in Depression-era America. This developed their house style: typically set in urban locations, fast paced structure with characters and storylines that were never sentimental. This allowed for very little individuality at the time; the only individuality would be the difference between the eight studios.
Oppositely, Arthur Penn took a lot of inspiration from French New Wave cinema. As movie theatres were no longer allowed to be owned by the studios, this allowed for much more individuality to enter into US theatres and were seen more by people in America. French new wave films were being created from an artistic and ambitious standpoint opposed to a standpoint that is to earn money, like Casablanca. This allowed for more individuality to enter, as people took inspiration from French new wave films, which were creatively controlled by the director as opposed to the studio.
The difference between the two eras of Hollywood can be seen in the introductions of the two protagonists. Humphrey Bogart’s Rick is introduced using precise movements from both the camera and the actor and heavily sticking to the genre conventions of the time. He is seen smoking a cigarette, while the camera pulls back. This was very similar to other ‘hero introductory sequences’ at the time. Bonnie and Clyde’s introductions are very unique when compared to Casablanca and other films of the ‘Golden Age of Hollywood. Bonnie is first seen naked, and Clyde is first seen, rather unheroically, stealing a car. The way Rick’s introduction is ‘glorious’ while Bonnie and Clyde’s is uneventful shows the shift in how Hollywood studios were not as controlling anymore, and allowed for more individuality in Hollywood filmmaking.
An example of a direct influence of French New Wave cinema on Bonnie and Clyde is the scene where Bonnie visits her mother and family in an abandoned area to hide from the world. In this scene long focal lengths are used to capture the gathering, with the camera being positioned away from the crowd. This allows the actors to be more improvisational with their movement as the increased focal length means the camera only needs to pan, rather than being moved entirely. This uses the idea of ‘cinema verite’, which is to capture things as they happen with little editing techniques and camera movement to distract the viewer from reality. In this scene, filters are used on the lenses to make the highlights bloom, creating a dreamlike effect. This was quite unconventional for the time, especially when compared to Casablanca. For example, a scene like this in Casablanca, when we flashback to Rick and Ilsa in Paris, it is shot like the rest of the film. Whereas in Bonnie and Clyde, this moment of escape looks separate from the rest of the film. A more individual and auteur approach is taken to this scene in Bonnie and Clyde, showing how the Hollywood machine was now crushing less individuality. One of the main influences French new wave cinema had over Bonnie and Clyde was shooting on location. French films often shot on location making the setting of the film feel realistic giving it depth. Shooting on location can be seen when Bonnie wants to see her mother, but can’t because she is a wanted criminal, so she runs off from the gang into a large cornfield. Arthur Penn chose to shoot on location here as it shows off the expansive landscape of the American south and to achieve a sense of realism that wouldn’t work as well if they had shot on a set. One shot shows Clyde running after her while craning up to show the expansive land. This both shows the realism of the location while also taking inspiration from the camera movement of western films.
Although independence increased over time, in the ‘Golden Age of Hollywood’ it was very difficult to take an auteur approach to a film. ‘New Hollywood’ showed studios losing creative control and directors gaining creative control over their projects. Films like Bonnie and Clyde were now being made without the need to fit into the house style of a studio; where directors were free to experiment with unexplored styles and unseen characters, unlike Casablanca, which used character conventions and the house style of the studio.